IBOV 183,476.86 ▼ 0.27% IPSA 11,255.90 ▼ 0.39% IPC MEX 64,992.23 ▲ 1.13% MERVAL 2,893,751 ▼ 1.57% COLCAP 2,584.72 ▼ 0.95% BVL PERÚ 59,934.37 ▲ 1.27% USD/BRL5.19▼ 0.12% USD/MXN17.68▼ 0.27% USD/CLP960.63▼ 0.27% USD/COP3,293▲ 0.20% USD/PEN3.39▼ 0.67% USD/ARS1,525▲ 0.30% USD/UYU40.21▲ 3.50% USD/PYG5,870▲ 2.23% USD/BOB12.17▲ 2.05% USD/DOP59.35▲ 0.25% USD/CRC450.87▲ 2.53% USD/GTQ7.64▲ 3.22% USD/HNL26.85▲ 0.31% USD/NIO36.62▲ 2.66% USD/VES853.52▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.77▲ 2.72% EUR/BRL5.91▲ 0.63% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 183,476.86 ▼ 0.27% IPSA 11,255.90 ▼ 0.39% IPC MEX 64,992.23 ▲ 1.13% MERVAL 2,893,751 ▼ 1.57% COLCAP 2,584.72 ▼ 0.95% BVL PERÚ 59,934.37 ▲ 1.27% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Saturday, September 26, 2026

Defense Monitor

Colombia Loses Two Soldiers to Insurgent Drones in Six Days

· Monday, May 25, 2026 · 8 min read

Defense · Operations & Incidents

Key Facts

—Three lethal drone strikes:. Colombian forces lost two soldiers and thirteen wounded across three departments between May 19 and May 24.

—Tactic diffused:. Both ELN and FARC dissidents executed the same commercial-drone explosive technique in the same six-day window.

—Procurement deadline tightens:. The $1.6 billion Escudo Nacional Antidrones contract is targeted for award before the May 31 first-round presidential vote.

—Drone-attack pace:. The Ejército Nacional recorded 107 drone attacks in 2026, with the fatality rate doubling in the past week.

—Regional implication:. The same suppliers competing in Bogotá are positioning for Mexico’s FIFA 2026 antidrone operation and Ecuador’s internal-security tenders.

In the six days between May 19 and May 24, Colombian security forces lost more soldiers to commercial-drone explosives than to any other tactic deployed by irregular armed groups — and the procurement instrument designed to answer this threat is now timing-bound to a presidential election the Petro government will not win.

Colombia Loses Two Soldiers to Insurgent Drones in Six Days
Colombia Loses Two Soldiers to Insurgent Drones in Six Days
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
17 years of Latin America reporting, on demand.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

The first attack came in the late afternoon of May 19. Tropas of the Bataillon de Despliegue Rápido N° 14 of the Tercera División del Ejército Nacional were conducting operations in the vereda Cañutico of Suárez, in the northern Cauca department, when drones operated by the “Jaime Martínez” structure of the FARC dissidence dropped explosives on the unit. Subteniente Ronald Darío Bedoya Rivero, an officer in the process of promotion after more than three years of service, was killed. Six professional soldiers were wounded. Minister of National Defense Pedro Sánchez Suárez, a retired Air Force major general, condemned the strike as “an unspeakable criminal act that will not go unpunished.”

The next morning, twenty-four hours later and roughly six hundred kilometers north-east, the Primera División del Ejército reported a second drone attack — in fact, two coordinated strikes — in the south of Bolívar department. Tropas of the Bataillón de Despliegue Rápido N° 25 in the vereda Santa Helena, in Santa Rosa del Sur, were struck first; Soldado Profesional Óscar Enrique Palacios Rivas was killed, one further soldier wounded. The attack was attributed to ELN Structure 37. A near-simultaneous strike against the Bataillón de Infantería de Selva N° 48 in the neighbouring municipality of Arenal wounded two non-commissioned officers and two soldiers. By the evening of May 20, the Ejército Nacional had registered its 107th drone attack of 2026 alone.

The third attack opened the morning of Sunday, May 24. In the rural sector of Barco La Silla of Tibú, in Norte de Santander — the heart of the Catatumbo region — a position of the Bataillón de Operations Terrestres N° 10 was struck by ELN drones in what military authorities characterized as a retaliation for the previous day’s combat in the vereda La Llana, where the Ejército had dismantled an irregular checkpoint on the Cucuta–Tibú route. Soldado Profesional Aldair Bermúdez Rodríguez was killed; seven soldiers were wounded and evacuated by air to medical centers in Cucuta. The Command de la Fuerza de Tarea Vulcano issued a sharp statement rejecting “el empleo de medios y métodos de guerra no convencionales mediante drones acondicionados con explosivos.”

Six Days, Three Strikes, Two Groups

Date Location Perpetrator Unit Attacked Casualties
May 19 Suárez, Cauca FARC-dissident “Jaime Martínez” Bataillón de Despliegue Rápido N° 14 1 KIA, 6 WIA
May 20 Santa Rosa del Sur & Arenal, Bolívar ELN Structure 37 BDR N° 25 + Bataillón Infantería de Selva N° 48 1 KIA, 5 WIA
May 24 Tibú, Norte de Santander (Catatumbo) ELN (Fuerza de Tarea Vulcano theatre) Bataillón de Operations Terrestres N° 10 1 KIA, 7 WIA

Why this is no longer an incident pattern

The Cauca strike alone would have read as the kind of episode Colombian forces have absorbed at irregular cadence since the December 2025 Aguachica attack that triggered the antidrone tender. The Bolívar strike a day later would have escalated it to a sequence. The Tibú strike on Sunday closes the analytical loop: three separate departments, two distinct armed groups, three different Ejército battalions, all within a six-day window. The technique — DJI Mavic 3 Pro and equivalent commercial quadcopters modified with dropping kits to release artisanal grenades — is now diffused across the irregular landscape rather than monopolized by any one structure. The Petro government’s December 2025 assessment, then 333 successful attacks in twelve months, now reads as a baseline rather than a peak. The Ejército has registered 107 drone attacks in 2026 to date and recorded 101 wounded soldiers and two killed; the rate of fatalities has doubled in the past week.

The procurement clock and the political clock are no longer compatible

The Escudo Nacional Antidrones contract was ordered by President Gustavo Petro on December 19, 2025, in the aftermath of the Aguachica strike that killed seven soldiers, with a stated commitment to award the contract before the May 31 first-round presidential election. The Ministerio de Defense has received bids from twenty-two companies across the United States, Turkey, South Korea, Germany, Spain, Finland, China and Australia, including Lockheed Martin, RTX, Northrop Grumman, Indra, Baykar, Saab, MKE, Bharat Electronics, Anduril and Motorola. Minister Sánchez signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Turkish Defense Industries Secretary Haluk Görgün in Doha in January 2026, signalling Baykar’s position in the final group. The total programme value crosses $1.6 billion.

The political problem is structural. Whichever administration is sworn in on August 7 will inherit a contract architecture chosen by an outgoing left-wing government whose foreign-supplier preferences — explicit non-purchase from Israel since 2024 in protest over Gaza, an opening to Turkish and Korean suppliers, a deliberate distance from the United States system — will not align cleanly with any of the right-leaning candidates leading current polls. An award before May 31 binds the next president to it; a slip past May 31 makes the next president the buyer. The Cauca, Bolívar and Tibú deaths between them have raised the political cost of slipping past that date to a level the current Ministerio cannot easily absorb.

Why does this matter outside Colombia?

Two reasons. The first is that Colombia is now the regional laboratory for non-conventional drone defense procurement: the same suppliers competing in Bogotá (Baykar, Anduril, Indra, Lockheed Martin, RTX) are the ones positioning across the México FIFA 2026 antidrone operativo recently disclosed by SEDENA, the Ecuadorian internal-security architecture under Defense Minister Gian Carlo Loffredo, and the Brazilian critical-infrastructure planning around Shield-Tinia. A contract outcome in Colombia shapes the region’s reference frame. The second is the tactic itself: commercial-platform armed drones are now an accessible insurgent capability across the entire LATAM internal-security landscape, from the México cartel theatre to the Ecuadorian gang corridors. Colombia is the first Latin American country to lose a regular war-of-attrition against this technology, but it will not be the last.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Escudo Nacional Antidrones?

A national antidrone shield programme ordered by President Petro in December 2025 after seven Colombian soldiers were killed in Aguachica, Cesar, by an ELN drone strike. The Ministerio de Defense described it as the “most ambitious and bold airspace defense strategy” in Colombian history. The programme includes radar, signal-jamming, kinetic intercept and detection-grid components, with bids open to twenty-two firms across eight countries. The Ministerio has stated the award target is before the May 31 first-round presidential election.

Which irregular armed groups are using drones in Colombia?

The Ejército de Liberación Nacional has been the most consistent user, including the December 2025 Aguachica attack and the May 20 and May 24 strikes documented above. The FARC dissident structure aligned with alias Iván Mordisco operates separate drone capability, including the May 19 Cauca attack via its “Jaime Martínez” sub-structure. The Clan del Golfo also operates armed drones independently. The Ejército Nacional’s 2026 tally of 107 attacks distributes across all three groups.

What kind of drones are being used?

Predominantly commercial-grade quadcopters, notably the DJI Mavic 3 Pro and equivalents, modified with after-market “dropping kits” that allow remote release of artisanal grenades or improvised explosive payloads. The platforms are cheap (a few thousand dollars each), available through retail and grey-market channels, and require minimal pilot training. This places the threat in a fundamentally different procurement category than purpose-built military drones: countering it requires a layered detection-and-jamming architecture rather than a single anti-air weapon.

Why is the timing of the antidrone contract politically sensitive?

President Petro’s government has made supplier choices that depart sharply from prior Colombian defense procurement practice — an explicit refusal to buy new military equipment from Israel since 2024 over Gaza, an opening to Turkish and South Korean suppliers, and a deliberate move away from automatic alignment with United States vendors. Whichever government is sworn in on August 7 may have different preferences. An award before May 31 binds the new administration to the outgoing one’s choices; a slip past May 31 transfers the decision and the political cost.

Connected Coverage

The Cauca strike was the lead operational story in the most recent Latin America Defense Monitor (Issue #11, May 16–23, 2026); the Bolívar and Tibú strikes will be carried forward into Issue #12 as a status-changed thread.

What changed since Issue #11

Issue #11 framed the May 19 Cauca attack as an isolated incident raising procurement-deadline pressure. Five days later, two more lethal strikes — one in south Bolívar on May 20, one in Tibú/Catatumbo on May 24 — have reframed the thread from incident to operational pattern. Both ELN and FARC dissidents are now active on the same tactic in the same week. The antidrone contract calendar and the presidential election calendar are no longer compatible.

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.