TUNISIA · ECONOMY
Key Facts
—Frozen deal: A 2022 staff-level IMF agreement worth about 1.9 billion dollars has stalled, with no board approval.
—Going alone: Tunisia plans to raise nearly 2 billion euros on international markets in 2026.
—July bill: A 750-million-euro Eurobond falls due in July 2026, to be settled from foreign-exchange reserves.
—Central-bank funding: Parliament has authorised the central bank to finance the budget by up to 7 billion dinars at zero interest.
—The sticking point: President Kais Saied has rejected the subsidy cuts and reforms the IMF wants attached to any loan.
—The risk: Direct central-bank financing can fuel inflation and threaten the bank’s independence, economists warn.
Tunisia IMF talks have gone nowhere, and the government is now betting it can fund itself, planning to raise nearly 2 billion euros on markets in 2026 and leaning on its central bank rather than accept the Fund’s conditions.
Why Tunisia IMF talks stalled
Tunisia reached a staff-level agreement with the IMF in 2022 worth about 1.9 billion dollars. It was never approved by the Fund’s board.
The hold-up is political as much as technical. The IMF wants subsidy cuts and public-wage reforms that the government has refused to make.
President Kais Saied has cast those conditions as foreign diktats. He has argued that Tunisia should not take orders on its own economy.
The result is a standoff that has dragged on for years. Each side is waiting for the other to move.
Going it alone
With the Fund on hold, Tunisia is trying to fund itself. The government plans to raise nearly 2 billion euros on international markets in 2026.
The most pressing bill comes in July, when a 750-million-euro Eurobond falls due. Officials plan to settle it from foreign-exchange reserves.
Meeting obligations from reserves buys time but drains a limited cushion. It is a strategy with a clear ceiling.
For investors, the question is how long self-reliance can last. Markets are watching each repayment closely.
Leaning on the central bank
The boldest move is at home. Parliament has authorised the central bank to finance the budget by up to 7 billion dinars at zero interest.
That amounts to printing money to cover the deficit. It is a tool governments reach for when other doors are closing.
Economists warn it can fuel inflation and crowd out private lending. It also chips away at the central bank’s independence.
The government frames it as an exceptional, temporary step. Critics fear exceptions have a way of becoming habits.
The risks of self-reliance
Tunisia has so far avoided the default that some analysts predicted. That is an achievement, but a fragile one.
Reserves, remittances and domestic borrowing have kept the state afloat. None of them is a bottomless source.
The danger is a slow squeeze rather than a sudden collapse. Higher inflation and weaker growth can erode living standards over time.
Figures and forecasts here shift quickly, and this is not financial advice. The official budget and central-bank statements remain the primary sources.
Where the money will come from
Stripped of the IMF, Tunisia’s funding rests on three legs. They are foreign reserves, domestic borrowing and, increasingly, the central bank.
Remittances from Tunisians abroad also help plug the gap. They are a quiet but vital source of hard currency.
Tourism, recovering from years of shocks, adds another stream. A strong season eases the pressure on reserves.
The government insists it can manage without a bailout. Its record of avoiding default gives that claim some weight.
None of these sources, on its own, closes the budget hole. Together they have so far been just enough.
The balance is delicate and leaves little room for error. A weak tourist season or a spike in oil prices could upset it.
The wider pattern
Tunisia is not alone in bristling at the IMF’s terms. Across the developing world, governments increasingly question the price of its help.
Some have turned to China, the Gulf or regional lenders instead. Others, like Tunisia, are trying to muddle through alone.
The appeal is obvious: no outside body dictating subsidy cuts or wage freezes. The cost is higher borrowing rates and thinner buffers.
For citizens, the stakes are concrete. Subsidies on bread and fuel are exactly what such reforms tend to target.
Tunisia’s path is a test case watched well beyond its borders. Others weighing the same choice will study how it ends.
What it means and what to watch
The July Eurobond is the next real test. Paying it on time would steady nerves and buy more room.
Beyond that, the market borrowing planned for 2026 will show how investors price Tunisian risk. Demand and yields will tell the story.
For now, Tunisia has chosen sovereignty over the IMF’s terms. Whether that choice proves affordable is the question the year will answer.
Frequently asked questions
Why has Tunisia not signed an IMF deal?
A 2022 staff-level agreement stalled because the government, led by President Kais Saied, refused the subsidy cuts and reforms the IMF wants attached.
How will Tunisia fund itself in 2026?
It plans to raise nearly 2 billion euros on international markets, lean on foreign-exchange reserves and use central-bank financing.
What debt does Tunisia owe in July 2026?
A 750-million-euro Eurobond falls due in July 2026, which officials plan to settle from foreign-exchange reserves.
Why is central-bank funding risky?
Financing the budget directly can fuel inflation, crowd out private credit and threaten the central bank’s independence, economists warn.
Connected Coverage
Tunisia’s gamble echoes debates across the region, from Senegal’s own IMF standoff to the market-building drive behind Morocco’s capital reforms. It plays out as African trade tops 1.5 trillion dollars.
Part of our ongoing coverage
Africa: The New Scramble — the great-power contest over the continent.
Read More from The Rio Times