1
US Jobs: 178,000 in March — Biggest Gain in Over a Year While Tariff Rate Hits 1943 High
The US economy added 178,000 jobs in March — the largest monthly gain in more than a year and a result that caught nearly every economist on Wall Street off guard. The Wall Street Journal had surveyed economists expecting just 59,000 new positions. The unemployment rate ticked down to 4.3%. Healthcare drove the recovery, with weather-normalisation providing a further lift to construction and leisure. The number is a decisive reversal from February’s loss of 133,000 jobs and extends a streak that has repeatedly humiliated recession forecasters across four years of consecutive disruption. The labour market’s resilience is not a coincidence — it is structural, driven by demographic demand for healthcare and care services, a construction sector still working through a multi-decade housing shortage, and a manufacturing sector receiving direct investment incentives from the One Big Beautiful Bill’s 100% bonus depreciation provision.
The complication is that the same labour market generating these jobs is simultaneously absorbing the highest tariff burden since 1943. After the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s original tariff authority in a 6-3 ruling in February, the administration pivoted to Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, enacting a 10% global tariff — raised to 15% over the weekend. The government collected $30.4 billion in customs duties in January alone, triple the pace of a year ago. Yale’s Budget Lab estimates the average US household is absorbing a $650–$780 annual cost increase at current tariff levels, rising to $1,130–$1,340 if Section 122 authority is made permanent. Manufacturing output gains 0.7% long-run, but construction contracts 2.0% and mining declines 0.8%. The net effect is a smaller economy overall — 0.1% lower GDP in perpetuity — with the gains concentrated in durable manufacturing and the losses spread across the rest. The midterm question is whether voters feel the paycheck or the price tag first.
For Latin American investors and exporters, the split-personality US economy defines the trade environment for 2026. A resilient US labour market supports consumption of Brazilian commodities, Chilean copper, Peruvian minerals, and Argentine agricultural goods that feed American industrial and food demand. But the 11% average effective tariff rate — the highest since 1943 — is not neutral toward foreign producers. Brazilian exporters selling into the US market, from Embraer aircraft components to orange juice concentrate to premium beef cuts, are operating in a competitive environment where their American-made rivals benefit from tariff protection while imported alternatives carry a structural cost premium. The Section 122 clock is the most important variable to track: at 150 days from enactment, a congressional battle over extension or expiration will begin in mid-summer 2026 and will determine the trade cost environment for Latin American exporters through 2027 and beyond.
2
New York: Mayor Mamdani’s Tax Agenda Triggers JPMorgan Exodus Warning — State Budget in Crisis
JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon issued a direct public warning to New York City’s new Democratic Socialist mayor Zohran Mamdani on Monday: crushing taxes and regulatory burdens are already generating a “large exodus” of businesses from the city. Dimon, who presides over more than 60,000 New York employees and the country’s largest bank by assets, did not name Mamdani explicitly but the target was unmistakable — the warning came in direct response to reports that the new administration is planning significant corporate and high-income tax increases as part of its affordability agenda. “Large exodus” is the operative phrase — not a warning about what might happen, but a characterisation of what is already under way. The New York Post reported separately that wealthy New Yorkers are relocating to Florida at an accelerating pace, with many choosing to rent rather than buy in South Florida, signalling uncertainty about permanent resettlement and the possibility of an eventual return if the political environment shifts.
The state budget crisis compounds the municipal one. New York state missed its April 1 statutory budget deadline — the first time in several years — with Governor Kathy Hochul’s administration described by fiscal analysts as “ignoring a looming financial crisis” while the global energy shock tightens revenues. The state faces structural headwinds: tariff-driven demand contraction reducing sales tax receipts, DOGE-era federal spending cuts reducing transfer payments to Albany, and energy costs compressing household purchasing power. Washington state’s experience is the live preview: its newly enacted steep income tax on high earners has produced a documented “mass exodus of corporations and wealth” from a state previously celebrated as a business-friendly low-tax haven — home to Amazon, Microsoft, and Boeing. The pattern of progressive tax push meeting immediate capital flight is now an empirically confirmed outcome, not a theoretical prediction, and New York is watching it play out in real time 2,800 miles away.
For Latin American investors, New York’s dynamics carry two direct implications. First: the Brazilian, Colombian, Argentine, and Venezuelan business and financial communities embedded in New York City — investment banks, law firms, family offices, and trade intermediaries — will monitor the business climate carefully. New York has historically been the gateway city for Latin American capital entering US markets; a city losing financial sector employers is also losing the institutional infrastructure that has made it the Western Hemisphere’s pre-eminent deal hub. Second: the capital migration from New York and California toward Florida and Texas that Dimon’s warning accelerates is simultaneously strengthening Miami as the Americas’ financial centre. Miami’s rise as the leading hub for Latin American private equity, family office, and cross-border M&A activity is directly and positively correlated with New York’s governance trajectory. Every banker and executive who relocates from Manhattan to Brickell strengthens the LatAm-Miami axis that has been building for a decade.
3
Canada: Carney Flies to Beijing as “Buy Canadian” Takes Hold — Poilievre Demands a Pipeline
Prime Minister Mark Carney is travelling to Beijing this week to meet President Xi Jinping — the most significant reorientation of Canadian trade diplomacy since the US-Canada relationship began deteriorating under Trump’s tariff regime. The visit is explicitly motivated by trade diversification: US tariffs on Canadian goods have materially damaged bilateral trade flows, and Carney’s government has responded at the procurement level with a “Buy Canadian” policy requiring all federal contracts above C$25 million to prioritise Canadian workers and companies. The United States has formally flagged the Buy Canadian rules as a “trade irritant” in an official government report — Washington’s acknowledgement that Canada’s counter-measures are having measurable commercial effect. US exports to Canada have dropped significantly; Canadian consumer behaviour has shifted toward domestic alternatives. Carney’s Beijing visit is the institutional confirmation that the diversification is strategic and sustained, not rhetorical.
The domestic political confrontation running in parallel is intense. Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre has issued a direct and unambiguous demand: approve a major pipeline immediately or forfeit credibility on Canadian economic sovereignty. Carney’s government has stalled on pipeline approval, caught between the environmental commitments of its Liberal coalition and the economic imperative of diversifying energy export routes away from US markets — which a new pipeline to Pacific tidewater would enable. Poilievre’s framing is gaining traction in Alberta and Saskatchewan, where energy sector employment is tightly bound to export capacity. Meanwhile, Ottawa has made a disclosure that underscores the security dimensions of Carney’s China engagement: an estimated 2,500 undeclared foreign agents are currently operating in Canada. The figure follows years of documented Chinese, Indian, and other state interference in Canadian federal elections and diaspora communities — and creates a politically awkward backdrop for the prime minister’s Beijing summit.
For Latin American investors, Canada’s pivot is relevant in ways that extend well beyond Canadian domestic politics. The Buy Canadian procurement push is accelerating Canada’s search for alternative trade partners — and Latin America offers exactly the resource complementarity Canada needs to reduce its US dependence. Chilean and Peruvian copper for Canadian industrial supply chains, Brazilian agricultural goods for food security diversification, Colombian oil for energy source diversification: all of these trade flows become more strategically attractive to Ottawa as the US-Canada relationship remains under tariff pressure. Carney’s housing policy — GST eliminated for first-time buyers on homes up to C$1 million, a C$8.8 billion Ontario construction partnership — is simultaneously opening skilled labour market opportunities that will attract Latin American construction and trades workers displaced by Trump’s US immigration enforcement. Canada is, at this moment, actively competing for the skilled Latin American talent that the US is simultaneously expelling.