Market Snapshot
| Pair / Index | Level | Day Chg | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| USD/ZAR | 15.91 | +0.4% | ▼ Modest retreat after post-budget rally; still near 2022 highs |
| USD/NGN | ~1,355 | -0.3% | ▶ CBN window stable; shea ban extends value-addition push |
| USD/KES | ~129.0 | Flat | ▶ High Court health MOU freeze adds policy uncertainty |
| Brent Crude | $70.78/bbl | -0.4% | ▼ US–Iran talks progress eases supply disruption fears |
| Gold | $5,226/oz | +1.2% | ▲ Rallying toward ATH $5,602; SA mining revenues surging |
| Copper | ~$13,000/t | -1.5% | ▼ Zambia health deal pushback over copper access clauses |
| Ferrochrome | — | Positive | ▲ Eskom 62c/kWh tariff signals SA smelter restarts; 24 furnaces eligible |
| JSE All Share | ~120,400 | -0.3% | ▼ Pulling back from ATH 126,952; mining sector selloff; Tongaat Hulett uncertainty |
| Lithium (Spodumene) | ~$850/t | +3.7% | ▲ Zimbabwe export ban continues to squeeze supply; rally extends |
Conflict & Stability Tracker
Critical
Tense
Tense
Watching
Fast Take
Developments to Watch
What happened: The DRC signed a $1.2 billion health partnership with the United States on Feb 26 — $900M in US funding and $300M in Congolese domestic co-investment over five years. On the same day, Africa CDC Director-General Jean Kaseya warned of “huge concerns regarding data, regarding pathogen sharing” in US bilateral health MOUs. Zimbabwe rejected a $367M deal, calling it “asymmetrical” and citing demands for biological data without guaranteed access to resulting medical innovations. Zambia pushed back on its $1B+ agreement after provisions linking health funding to copper and cobalt mining access emerged. Kenya’s $1.6B MOU remains frozen by the High Court. The US has now signed 19 bilateral health MOUs representing $19.8B — $12.2B in US assistance and $7.5B in co-investment. The State Department said it would begin “winding down” health assistance to Zimbabwe.So what: The continent is splitting into two camps on the most consequential restructuring of US health assistance since PEPFAR was created. Countries signing — DRC, Nigeria, Uganda and 16 others — gain predictable multi-year funding but accept pathogen data-sharing obligations whose commercial implications are undefined. Countries refusing — Zimbabwe, Zambia and effectively Kenya — protect data sovereignty but face the immediate loss of programmes that in Zimbabwe’s case support 1.2 million people on HIV treatment. The linking of health funding to mineral access in Zambia’s case is the sharpest illustration of the Trump administration’s transactional approach. Africa CDC’s public intervention signals that the African Union is positioning itself as a mediating voice, but it lacks the funding to replace American support. The real test: whether Zambia and Zimbabwe can mobilise domestic and alternative financing before programme interruptions become humanitarian crises.
What happened: Eskom announced a 29% reduction in electricity tariffs for Samancor Chrome and the Glencore-Merafe joint venture on Feb 27, cutting rates to 62 South African cents per kilowatt-hour from the interim 87.74c/kWh approved in January. The decision came one day before the Feb 28 deadline after which Glencore would have resumed retrenchment processes at its three remaining smelters. South Africa holds approximately 80% of the world’s known chrome reserves but has lost its position as the world’s top ferrochrome processor to China due to electricity costs that have surged over 900% since 2008. Only 4 of 59 historical furnaces are currently operating. The new tariff could enable 24 furnaces to restart. Electricity Minister Ramokgopa indicated broader smelter relief is under consideration. The government will fund the tariff shortfall to protect standard consumers.So what: This is the most significant industrial policy intervention in South Africa in years, and it arrives at the intersection of energy reform and beneficiation politics. The 62c tariff — built on a model where surplus coal produces surplus power wheeled to smelters — essentially creates a virtual independent power producer within the Eskom framework. If 24 furnaces restart, South Africa begins to reclaim ferrochrome processing from China using its own raw materials and surplus energy. The precedent is explosive: steel, aluminium and every other energy-intensive industry will now demand equivalent treatment. Eskom CEO Dan Marokane faces a balance sheet squeeze. But the broader signal — that the GNU is prepared to use industrial energy pricing as a competitive weapon — may be the most consequential domestic policy development since the budget.
What happened: President Ramaphosa transferred the investigation into Iran’s participation in Exercise Will of Peace from the Defence Ministry to the Presidency on Feb 26. Justice Bernard Ngoepe will chair a four-person panel including two additional judges and a rear admiral. The probe relates to the alleged failure by SANDF commanders to comply with Ramaphosa‘s direct instruction to exclude the Iranian navy from the Chinese-led exercise in South African waters in January 2026. The panel can summon any defence force member and access classified documents. It has one month to report. The move came after the SANDF’s own board of inquiry failed to produce results more than a month after being given seven days. Vice-Admiral Monde Lobese is reported to be the central figure under investigation. The US had condemned Iran’s participation.So what: This is about something far larger than a naval exercise. Ramaphosa is asserting civilian command authority over a military that appears to have defied a direct presidential order — a constitutional crisis in miniature. The diplomatic stakes are equally serious: Iran’s participation further strained relations with Washington at a time when the Afrikaner refugee programme, AGOA uncertainty and South Africa’s exclusion from key US diplomatic events are already fraying bilateral ties. By moving the probe to the Presidency, Ramaphosa signals that he views the SANDF’s conduct as a potential national security threat, not merely an administrative lapse. The question is whether the investigation produces accountability or becomes another inquiry that generates a confidential report and no consequences.
What happened: Zimbabwe gazetted Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 on Feb 16, proposing to extend presidential and parliamentary terms from five to seven years and replace direct presidential elections with a parliamentary ballot. If applied to the current cycle, the changes would keep President Mnangagwa in power until 2030 rather than requiring him to step down in 2028. Zanu-PF Treasurer Patrick Chinamasa publicly told Mnangagwa his personal views on the extension “do not matter anymore.” Churches issued a “Hands Off the Constitution” warning. Opposition meeting venues have been torched. The bill also allows the president to appoint 10 additional senators and permits traditional leaders to participate in politics. Legal experts say any amendment benefiting a sitting president requires a national referendum under the 2013 Constitution. VP Constantino Chiwenga’s faction is reportedly bitterly opposed.So what: Zimbabwe now faces simultaneous constitutional, economic and health crises. The mineral export ban, the rejected US health deal and the constitutional amendment are all connected by a single thread: a regime that is consolidating control over every lever of sovereignty while economic conditions deteriorate. The shift from popular election to parliamentary selection of the president would eliminate the one remaining mechanism by which Zimbabweans can directly reject their leader. The Chiwenga–Mnangagwa factional split makes the outcome unpredictable: if Chiwenga controls enough military and party loyalty to block the amendment, the succession crisis could become a governance crisis. International attention is fragmented: Washington is focused on mineral access, not democratic backsliding. South Africa is preoccupied with its own challenges. The Zimbabwean opposition is fragmented and infiltrated. The churches may be the last institutional check.
What happened: The Durban High Court hearing on Tongaat Hulett’s provisional liquidation could not proceed on Feb 27 as several intervening parties, arguing the 134-year-old company can still be rescued, needed time to file opposing papers. Judge Sanele Hlatshwayo set filing deadlines through mid-March and will consult with the Judge President on a hearing date. The liquidation application follows the collapse of the Vision Group’s rescue plan after failing to secure IDC funding and receiving a R11.7 billion demand. AmaZulu King Misuzulu met Vision’s leadership on Feb 26 to discuss saving the company. KwaZulu-Natal’s 27,000 small-scale farmers face the prospect of four million tonnes of cane rotting in fields if mills close, threatening an estimated one million livelihoods. Tongaat accounts for 27% of South Africa’s sugar production and 40% of its refining capacity.So what: Tongaat Hulett has become a test case for whether South Africa‘s legal and financial system can prevent the collapse of a systemically important agricultural employer. The intervention of the Zulu King adds a political and cultural dimension. The sugar industry’s vulnerability — low-cost imports flooding the market, a single company controlling refining capacity — is a structural problem that liquidation will not solve but will catastrophically expose. The filing delays suggest there are parties with viable rescue proposals, but the complexity of the debt structure (R12B accounting fraud legacy, SCA levy rulings, IDC funding gaps) makes any rescue fragile. For the GNU, a Tongaat collapse in KwaZulu-Natal — a province still scarred by the 2021 unrest — would be a socioeconomic disaster with political consequences.
What happened: President Tinubu extended the ban on raw shea nut exports for one year from Feb 26, 2026 to Feb 25, 2027, withdrawing all previously granted waivers and requiring surplus production to be exported through the Nigerian Commodity Exchange framework. Nigeria produces approximately 40% of global shea output but captures only about 1% of the $6.5 billion global shea market. Processed shea butter commands 10–20 times the price of raw nuts. The government has set a short-term target of $300 million in annual revenues from value-added shea products and aims for a tenfold increase by 2027. A Livelihood Finance Mechanism will pilot production support, and the Federal Ministry of Finance will open a dedicated funding window.So what: Nigeria’s shea ban, like Zimbabwe’s mineral export ban, reflects Africa’s growing refusal to be a raw-materials exporter. The economics are compelling: a ten-to-twenty-fold price differential between raw and processed output. But the policy has generated sharp divisions among Nigerian exporters, with some warning of foreign exchange losses and supply chain disruptions. The critical question — as with every African beneficiation push — is whether domestic processing capacity actually exists to absorb the supply and whether the infrastructure and quality standards needed for global markets can be built within the ban period. If Nigeria succeeds, it creates a template for other agricultural commodities. If it fails, it creates a domestic supply glut that destroys value for producers.
Sovereign & Credit Pulse
| Country | Development | Outlook |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | Eskom ferrochrome tariff cut to 62c/kWh; Iran naval probe escalated to Presidency; Tongaat Hulett liquidation hearing adjourned; COSATU 7-day GEMS deadline clock ticking (expires ~Mar 5); Afrikaner refugee processing accelerated by US | Industrial policy credibility rising; civil-military tension emerging; multiple institutional stress tests active simultaneously; credit upgrade path intact but fragile |
| DRC | $1.2B US health partnership signed (2026–2031); $900M US + $300M domestic; co-financing creates budget pressure; data-sharing terms undisclosed; ceasefire fragile | Largest US bilateral health commitment in Africa; absorptive capacity and procurement transparency are key risks; mineral MOU (Orion/Glencore) strengthens US strategic relationship |
| Zimbabwe | Rejected $367M US health deal; Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 gazetted; mineral export ban continues; US winding down health assistance; 1.2M HIV patients at risk | Triple crisis: constitutional, health and economic; regime consolidation accelerating; international isolation deepening; Chiwenga succession battle critical variable |
| Zambia | Pushed back on $1B+ US health deal over mining access clauses; 30% increase in domestic health financing underway; Africa’s second-largest copper producer at centre of US mineral strategy | Sovereignty vs. health financing trade-off; April 1 bilateral compact deadline looming; Hichilema’s “take care of our own affairs” stance under stress-testing |
Power Players
| Name | Role | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Jean Kaseya | Africa CDC Director-General | Publicly flagged “huge concerns” over pathogen data-sharing in US health MOUs; positioning Africa CDC as continental mediator between signatories and holdouts |
| Kgosientsho Ramokgopa | SA Electricity Minister | Drove Eskom 62c/kWh ferrochrome tariff; signalling broader smelter relief; reshaping SA industrial energy pricing as competitive policy tool |
| Bernard Ngoepe | Justice / Panel Chair | Appointed to lead presidential probe into SANDF defiance on Iran naval exercise; one-month deadline; power to summon military and access classified documents |
| Patrick Chinamasa | Zanu-PF Treasurer General | Publicly told Mnangagwa his views on term extension “do not matter”; driving Constitutional Amendment Bill; key architect of 2030 agenda |
| Roger Kamba | DRC Health Minister | Signed $1.2B US health partnership; framed it as investment in “health sovereignty”; navigating continental criticism while securing largest US health commitment in Africa |
Regulatory & Policy Watch
| Jurisdiction | Measure | Status |
|---|---|---|
| United States | America First Global Health Strategy MOUs — 19 signed ($19.8B total: $12.2B US + $7.5B co-investment); pathogen data-sharing and mineral access conditions generating pushback | Active — DRC signed Feb 26; Zimbabwe/Zambia rejected; Kenya frozen by court; Africa CDC raising systemic concerns |
| South Africa | Eskom ferrochrome tariff reduction to 62c/kWh for Samancor Chrome and Glencore-Merafe; government-funded shortfall; broader smelter relief under consideration | Active — announced Feb 27; averts immediate retrenchments; Nersa approval received; 12-month initial period |
| Zimbabwe | Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 — extends presidential terms 5→7 years; parliamentary election of president; 10 additional senators; traditional leaders may participate in politics | Gazetted Feb 16 — public consultation phase; Zanu-PF holds two-thirds majority; referendum requirement disputed; opposition mobilising |
| Nigeria | Raw shea nut export ban extended one year (Feb 26 2026–Feb 25 2027); all waivers withdrawn; NCX export framework mandated; NESS Support Window and Livelihood Finance Mechanism activated | Active — second extension; follows initial 6-month ban from Aug 2025; stakeholder divisions over impact persist |
Calendar & Watchlist
| Date | Event | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 28 | Eskom–Glencore ferrochrome MOU deadline | 62c/kWh tariff announced ahead of deadline; formal agreement expected; retrenchments averted |
| ~Mar 5 | COSATU GEMS 7-day deadline expires | If no reversal of 9.8% premium hike: Phase 2 workplace mobilisation and potential national march |
| Mar 9–12 | Tongaat Hulett — heads of argument filing deadlines | BRPs file by Mar 9; respondents/intervening parties by Mar 12; hearing date TBD by Judge President |
| ~Mar 27 | Ngoepe panel — Iran naval exercise report due | One-month deadline from establishment; findings on SANDF command defiance; classified proceedings |
| Apr 1 | Zambia–US bilateral compact deadline | If mineral access provisions unresolved, US health deal (~$1B) terminated per draft agreement terms |
| Dec 31 | AGOA expiry deadline | Shortest extension in programme history; 450K US jobs and 1M+ African jobs at stake; SA excluded from G20 invitees |
Bottom Line
The terms on which Africa engages with America are being renegotiated across every domain simultaneously — and the results are contradictory.
In health, the continent has split. Nineteen countries have signed bilateral MOUs worth nearly $20 billion under Washington’s America First Global Health Strategy. But Zimbabwe and Zambia have walked away, Kenya’s deal is frozen by a court, and the Africa CDC has publicly warned that pathogen data-sharing clauses threaten continental sovereignty. The DRC’s $1.2 billion agreement — signed the same day the Africa CDC raised its alarm — illustrates the impossible trade-off: accept conditions that may compromise data sovereignty, or lose funding that keeps 1.2 million people on HIV treatment. The Trump administration’s linkage of health funding to mineral access in Zambia strips away any pretence that these are purely humanitarian arrangements. They are transactional deals in which health, minerals and data are bundled into a single negotiating package.
In industry, South Africa demonstrated that the GNU can act decisively when the stakes are clear. The Eskom ferrochrome tariff cut — from 87.74c to 62c per kilowatt-hour — arrived at the last possible moment to prevent Glencore from executing thousands of retrenchments. If 24 furnaces restart, South Africa begins to reverse a decade of industrial hollowing-out in a sector where it holds 80% of global reserves. Nigeria’s extension of the shea nut export ban represents the same logic applied to agriculture: capture value domestically or lose it permanently. Both policies share the beneficiation DNA of Zimbabwe’s mineral export ban. Africa is no longer willing to be the mine or the farm. Whether it has the processing capacity to be the factory is the unresolved question.
In governance, the cracks are widening. Ramaphosa’s seizure of the Iran naval probe from a military that apparently ignored a direct presidential order is a test of civilian authority that the GNU cannot afford to fail — especially while Washington is watching. Zimbabwe’s Constitutional Amendment Bill, which would keep Mnangagwa in power until 2030 by abolishing direct presidential elections, is the most brazen power consolidation attempt on the continent in years. Uganda’s Supreme Court has confirmed Museveni for yet another term, this time not even contested on the merits.
The thread connecting Kinshasa, Harare, Lusaka, Pretoria and Abuja is this: African governments are asserting sovereignty more forcefully than at any point since the structural adjustment era — but the quality of that sovereignty varies enormously. The DRC accepts American health money with unknown conditions. Zimbabwe rejects it while dismantling its own constitution. South Africa negotiates industrial tariffs while investigating whether its own military follows orders. Nigeria bans exports without fully building the processing infrastructure. The assertion of agency is real. Whether it produces outcomes that serve citizens rather than regimes is the question that separates rhetoric from governance.

