Key Points
- Lima and Callao will remain under emergency rules for 30 more days, starting January 20, 2026.
- Key northern provinces, including Trujillo and border areas in Tumbes, get 60 more days starting January 19.
- Police keep command, the military supports operations, and some constitutional rights stay temporarily restricted.
Peru’s government has renewed a state of emergency in Lima Metropolitan Area and the neighboring province of Callao, extending extraordinary security powers for 30 days as authorities try to contain organized crime and everyday street violence.
The cabinet decision also broadens the focus to the north. For 60 days, emergency status will continue in Tumbes and Zarumilla, near the Ecuador border, and in Trujillo and Virú, in the La Libertad region.
Officials argue these areas face sustained pressure from criminal networks, including extortion and violent crime, with spillovers into commerce, transport, and daily life.
Under the renewals, the National Police remains responsible for internal order, while the Armed Forces provide operational support.
Peru Extends State of Emergency Measures
Security commanders are instructed to define intervention zones using intelligence, crime indicators, statistics, and crime-mapping tools, aiming to concentrate resources where violence and criminal logistics are most entrenched.
The legal basis is Peru’s Constitution, which permits temporary restrictions or suspensions of specific rights during an emergency.
The renewed measures cite limits linked to personal liberty and security, inviolability of the home, freedom of assembly, and freedom of movement.
In practical terms, the Lima-Callao framework also affects large public gatherings. Mass religious, cultural, or sporting events may require authorization under safety inspection rules, while smaller events can proceed without prior approval.
The decision reflects a pattern rather than a one-off response. The current Lima-Callao extension follows emergency decrees issued in October 2025 and renewed through late 2025, with the latest order again requiring a results report once the period ends.
Supporters frame the extensions as a necessary assertion of state authority in the face of criminals who exploit weak enforcement.
Critics counter that repeated emergencies risk becoming routine, and argue lasting gains depend on prosecutions, prisons, and judicial follow-through, not only patrols.