Opinion: How long will the mainstream deny Covid vaccine deaths?

Looking at the American, European, or Swedish statistics, a rational person should conclude, "dear experts, dear government, dear vaccine manufacturers: we need to talk."

vaccination, Opinion: How long will the mainstream deny Covid vaccine deaths?

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – (Opinion) If it were not for a few courageous statisticians who study the official figures of the vaccination side effect databases week after week, the public would have no chance to form an opinion regarding the fatal mRNA Covid vaccination side effects.

Then only the official mantra would remain: “Vaccination is tested, safe and effective”. Armies of fake or industry-funded “fact-checkers” would continue to confirm this; the big legacy media would publish these opinions and denounce all other representations as misinformation, exercising censorship not seen in 80 years and suppressing any discussion.

Read also: Check out our coverage on curated alternative narratives

Looking at the VAERS statistics below, a rational person should conclude, “dear experts, dear government, dear vaccine manufacturers: we need to talk.”

WORLDWIDE INCREASE IN DEATHS IN TEMPORAL PROXIMITY TO VACCINATION

It is not necessarily the case that every death recorded in the statistics is related to Covid vaccinations or that they are causally and solely responsible.

vaccination, Opinion: How long will the mainstream deny Covid vaccine deaths?

One can also simply stick to the facts and acknowledge: Yes, there has been an extreme increase in deaths since the late 2020s. And not just in the U.S. VAERS but in every database that serves the same purpose: to highlight potential problems with medications and vaccines.

These databases were created to protect the public, so madness like the Thalidomide scandal could never happen again.

But apparently, governments and experts are indeed incapable of learning. Instead of allowing thorough investigations and exercising maximum vigilance, they deny or outright lie.

(Fox News’s Tucker Carlson on death rates, March 2022)

EXCESS DEATHS POINT TO VACCINES

This can sound like a heartless description, but there will be a “usual” or expected number of deaths at any given time of year – “excess deaths” means numbers above this level.

In simple terms, if 200 deaths were expected for a given week and there were 300 recorded, for this week, there would have been 100 excess deaths.

There is currently a lot of controversy about why, with the rollout of Covid-19 vaccines, these excess death numbers have suddenly skyrocketed and go hand in hand with the administration of vaccines.

While the official authorities deny the connection, many doctors and scientists say the opposite.

Everyone has to make up their own minds, but what caused the excess deaths to skyrocket so massively if it wasn’t the vaccines?

For example, Professor Richard Ennos, a retired academic from Edinburgh, says: “What differs between the two years? The glaringly obvious answer is the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccination.”

“There was no Covid-19 vaccination program in 2020, but there was the roll-out of Covid vaccinations in a sequential way to increasingly younger age groups in 2021, a pattern that we see in the manifestation of excess deaths.”

OFFICIAL NUMBERS

But back to hard facts. The current numbers of deaths reported in temporal proximity to Covid vaccination are:

EMA database 24,732 deaths
WHO database 21,446 deaths
VAERS database 28,018 deaths

For interpretation, it is essential to note that there is evidence of “underreporting” worldwide, meaning that these numbers represent only 1-10% of actual cases.

It has not been proven that all these cases are directly related to vaccination; there is only a temporal relationship.

It is not only old people who would have “died anyway”, as among the dead are also infants, children, and middle-aged people. Some pilots are also among them, unfortunately.

For the English-speaking people of the world, the following databases are the most accessible:

VAERS – Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting, the database of the CDC in the US.

Eurdravigilance – an information service of the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

VigiAccess/VigiBase – The WHO database operated in Sweden.

In addition, there is data from the British “Yellow Card Reporting” system, although reporting there has been increasingly restricted because the data are “misused.”

What is meant by this is that more and more opposition to the official Covid narrative is coming from civil society.

UNDERREPORTING LEAVES MANY CASES UNRECORDED

These databases were created as an early warning system for vaccines to determine if side effects are clustered and what they are.

There are multiple reasons why side effects are not fully reported. On the one hand, many consider mild side effects negligible; on the other hand, physicians do not receive money for the time-consuming reporting and therefore do not carry it out.

Still, other cases go unreported because doctors and those in charge downplay the matter or because those affected are afraid of being considered “fakers and deniers.”

But the real deniers are probably to be found on the side of the vaccine fanatics. It has been a worldwide medical practice to suspend the use of drugs in cases of clustered deaths and first to conduct a thorough investigation of the causes.

This also required only a few deaths in the single digits on several occasions back then. Covid-19 and the government-mandated vaccination campaigns changed everything; suddenly, safety and even human lives were secondary.

11.7 billion (!) “vaccine doses” have already been administered worldwide. Thus, the argument is correct that the undesirable side effect of “death” occurs statistically only in a few people.

Likewise, it is repeatedly stated that 6.26 million people worldwide would have died from or with Covid-19. Therefore, the few vaccination deaths would be negligible.

On the other hand, it is becoming increasingly clear that the claim that vaccinations prevent deaths is not true and is rather anecdotal.