Venezuela’s legislative assembly has suggested a public vote on the Essequibo area, currently under dispute with Guyana.
Jorge Rodriguez, the assembly leader, announced this proposal. He said the vote would allow Venezuelans to weigh in on Essequibo’s ownership.
No date has been set for the vote yet.
Both nations claim this resource-rich, 160,000-square-kilometer region. The dispute reignited in 2015 when Exxon Mobil found oil there.
Following this, Venezuela criticized Guyana’s recent oil auctions as “illegal.”
Guyana argues it can develop anywhere within its borders. Recently, U.S. official Brian Nichols supported Guyana’s oil activities in the area.
Venezuela accused the U.S. of escalating the dispute.
Last December, Guyana auctioned off 11 oil blocks. It adheres to a 1899 Paris court boundary.
Venezuela relies on the 1966 Geneva Agreement, which proposes a negotiated solution.
Background
This situation sheds light on long-standing geopolitical tensions. Interestingly, the issue has taken on a global dimension.
The U.S. backing Guyana adds a new layer of complexity. Venezuela’s call for a public vote might be a strategy to rally domestic support.
It also highlights the country’s use of democratic mechanisms for international issues.
However, the move might not change the legal standing of the dispute. International law may not recognize the referendum’s outcome.
This makes the Geneva Agreement and the 1899 Paris court ruling crucial. These historical treaties still guide the talks between both countries.
The entry of Exxon Mobil in 2015 also adds an economic angle. Oil interests might play a big role in how this unfolds.
Consequently, the resolution of this dispute will likely involve a blend of historical claims, legal arguments, and economic interests.
The referendum marks just one chapter in an intricate, multi-layered issue.