IBOV 185,188.13 ▼ 0.01% IPSA 11,315.26 ▼ 1.14% IPC MEX 65,473.16 ▲ 0.91% MERVAL 3,062,910 ▼ 1.39% COLCAP 2,535.71 ▲ 1.86% BVL PERÚ 59,719.97 ▲ 0.50% USD/BRL5.11▲ 0.28% USD/MXN16.92▼ 0.33% USD/CLP930.34▼ 0.77% USD/COP3,136▼ 1.04% USD/PEN3.36▼ 0.06% USD/ARS1,508▼ 0.17% USD/UYU40.23▲ 1.13% USD/PYG5,924▲ 2.31% USD/BOB12.30▲ 4.75% USD/DOP58.47▼ 0.14% USD/CRC447.49▲ 1.34% USD/GTQ7.63▲ 2.30% USD/HNL26.84▲ 1.66% USD/NIO36.62▲ 0.71% USD/VES802.80▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.65▲ 0.05% EUR/BRL5.94▼ 0.48% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 185,188.13 ▼ 0.01% IPSA 11,315.26 ▼ 1.14% IPC MEX 65,473.16 ▲ 0.91% MERVAL 3,062,910 ▼ 1.39% COLCAP 2,535.71 ▲ 1.86% BVL PERÚ 59,719.97 ▲ 0.50% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Thursday, September 3, 2026

A.I. unmasked: the hidden political biases in leading language models like ChatGPT

By · August 17, 2023 · 2 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

Recent research has thrown light on the political biases inherent in AI language models.

Multiple academic studies suggest that, based on the data and algorithms used, these models may not be as neutral as intended.

According to MIT Technology Review, a comprehensive study led by researchers from the University of Washington, Carnegie Mellon University, and Xi’an Jiaotong University analyzed 14 AI models, including popular ones like ChatGPT by OpenAI.

When posed with politically charged statements, these models exhibited a range of biases. Notably, ChatGPT leaned towards left-wing libertarian views.

Another study, conducted by the University of East Anglia, specifically observed ChatGPT and found “significant and systemic” left-wing bias.

Photo Internet reproduction.
Photo Internet reproduction.
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
17 years of Latin America reporting, on demand.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

This study further supported its findings by analyzing ChatGPT’s responses to a series of ideological questions, confirming the chatbot’s favoritism towards the Labour Party and US Democrats.

The cause of these biases can be attributed to the extensive text data from the internet used to train these AI models.

Any inherent bias in the data can potentially influence the model’s outputs. Further, the algorithms used in the training process might amplify existing biases.

Dr. Fabio Motoki, the lead author of the latter study, voiced concerns over the implications of these findings, given the widespread use of platforms like ChatGPT.

Emphasizing the potential dangers, he stated, “Just as the media, the internet, and social media can influence the public, this could be very harmful.”

Meanwhile, Chan Park, from the former study, opined that no AI language model can be entirely free from biases.

The importance of these findings lies in their potential impact on products and services that millions interact with daily.

Biased AI models could inadvertently harm or offend users, further skewing the information landscape.

Tech companies developing these models have faced criticism for perceived biases.

OpenAI, for instance, has asserted its commitment to not favoring any political group and views any emerging biases as unintentional.

The rigorous examination of AI models’ political inclinations underscores the pressing need for increased transparency and scrutiny.

Both research teams hope their studies foster a broader awareness and conversation around the ethical implications of AI.

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.