Many mining firms are eager to strike lithium deals within Chile’s revamped framework.
Chile, home to the most significant known reserves of this essential metal for electric vehicle batteries, is witnessing an uptick in interest.
In response to increasing demand, Chilean officials are pinpointing new extraction areas and devising a comprehensive bidding procedure for contracts that could encompass both exploration and mining activities.
In a recent discussion, Karla Flores from InvestChile emphasized these developments to Bloomberg Linea.
Recent promotional activities took place in Germany and France, with another scheduled in Asia for October, targeting Korea, Japan, and China, as confirmed by Flores.
Historically, Chile’s lithium production was monopolized by two firms operating in a single salt flat.
This left Chile’s market share dwindling over time.
President Gabriel Boric’s solution is a model where the state assumes a majority stake in vital strategic explorations, leaving non-strategic zones to private enterprises.
Addressing concerns that a state-driven industry could hamper competitiveness, the government believes its approach promotes sustainable production in a nation that already designates lithium as a state-controlled strategic resource.
“We are catching up swiftly and rightly so,” Flores commented, advocating the benefits of clear and equal opportunities for investors.
Exploration contract bidding is anticipated to commence early next year.
Setting selection criteria poses a challenge due to the variety of proposals, spanning from extraction to value-added product manufacturing.
State-owned companies Enami and Codelco, chosen for collaboration with private firms, are also in the process of establishing their lithium-oriented teams and procedures.
“There’s a lineup of parties keen to negotiate with Enami and Codelco,” Flores noted. However, a clear, fair mechanism for all is imperative.
Despite widespread endorsements for this new approach, from the mining industry to global bodies, lingering misconceptions about it being akin to nationalization and uncertainties about project ownership have left some investors wary.
“It’s a well-intentioned strategy, largely welcomed,” said Max Vichniakov of Northern Shoreline. “Yet, its ambiguous rollout equates to heightened financial risk.”